Pages

Recent Posts

Showing posts with label Government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Government. Show all posts

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Pentagon Planning New Cybersecurity Strategy

cyber-security

By: Kareem 

The pentagon is reportedly set to release a new strategy for protecting it’s computer systems today. The new strategy will apparently make more use of sensors, software and recent data collecting done by U.S intelligence.

The pentagon is saying they don’t want to come off as too aggressive in their new strategy saying that they’re not looking to militarize cyberspace but rather to deny other militaries access and dissuade them from attempting an attack.

In drafts of a speech set to be given today by Deputy Defense Secretary William J. Lynn III,

“Although it is certainly possible that a destructive or disruptive cyber attack could have an impact analogous to physical hostilities and therefore constitute an act of war, the vast majority of malicious cyber activity today would not cross this threshold, or justify a military response,”

It’s always wise to be wary of the military moving into any domain, be it physical or ‘cyber’ so take their words with a grain of salt and make sure you read between the lines. More on this to come.

Related Stuffs:

Source: The Washington Post

Friday, June 17, 2011

U.S Government Building Fake Internet To Practice It’s Skills

hacking

By: Kareem 

So apparently the U.S government is getting sick of losing so many battles to hackers. They’re building a fake internet to model the real internet so they can practice defending against attacks from hackers. All while hackers are busy on the real internet finding real vulnerabilities to exploit.

I don’t blame the government, I’d be a little concerned too if people kept hacking my servers and users. However I really don’t see this doing much in the way of helping defend against cyber attacks. First off the government seems to think that defending all of our electric grids and sensitive information is only worth $500 million. A drop in the bucket compared to how much is spent on other security issues. That amount will buy you a whole lot of college-educated ‘security experts’ and probably 0 hackers. What the government dosen’t seem to understand is that hackers for the most part are not bad people. That’s why we have the term cybercriminal. Hackers are defiantly poking around on systems all over the world, but very few want to do more than just take a peek or earn bragging rights. If the government considers this a ‘war’ than they better start learning their enemy and stop going after the people who might have the skill and be willing to help. Secondly, this is a control environment, their whole test web can be reset and wiped at any time… not a very good thing when there are people on the real internet taking advantage of the fact it can not be shutdown, using zero-day exploits and other various means that are fairly difficult to reproduce. Hackers tend to be the type that look for a way around, over, under or through whatever obstacle is preventing them from getting access. Well I can see the benefits of a controlled environment to test on, I really don’t think they have the know-how to take advantage, they are, after all the ones who left the vulnerabilities there in the first place.

My biggest beef by far coming out of all this is the fact the U.S government wants to treat hacking as an act of war. This is just plain stupid. Hackers are not ‘warriors’ they are smart, curious people. Treating them like warriors and forcing them into a situation where it’s us vs them is a terrible thing for any government to do. Attacking your own citizens for pointing out your stupidity and oversight is not the way to win over anyone or stop any hacker. What they should do is extend an olive branch. Allow hackers to stay anonymous and put them to work defending against foreign attacks. Tap the resource that is their minds, the same minds that spend countless hours learning the ins-and-outs of computer systems in order to get around barriers. These are the only people that are skilled enough and willing enough to spend all day and night hacking and sending you the information you need to defend your servers. Unfortunately this will not happen. The U.S government will turn hackers who were just curious before into their greatest enemy. An enemy with no face, no country, nothing to lose and that if pushed too hard (see Sony) will own your systems with no remorse or regret, no matter how many ‘fake’ internets you create or how many 9-5ers you hire.

So let this stand as a caution to the U.S government. If you go down this route there is no turning back, if you decide to try and catch hackers you will get a pretty nasty surprise. You should just sit back ignore them and let them do their thing. Go ahead and hunt down the ones who are criminal, no one will fault you for that. But leave the lulz (and I don’t mean LulzSec) alone. Thank your god that they haven’t had good reason to show their teeth and don’t start wars you know you can’t win. It’s like Canada trying to invade America by building a small ‘America’ in their county and working on different invasion tactics. You will have the same success they would if they were dumb enough to try.

Related Stuffs:

Source: BBC

Thursday, April 21, 2011

White House Android App Released

official-whitehouse-app

The White House has finally released an App for the Android marketplace which joins the current iPhone White House App that’s been available since January 2010.

For those unfamiliar with the iPhone version the app allows you to follow the White House blog, see behind the scenes pictures and videos and get the latest news. The App also has a feature which lets you stream live press conferences and even alerts you when they’re about to happen.

President Obama has already made some decent efforts to enhance White House IT, according to his CIO Vivek Kundra, when Obama and his team came into office, federal IT was undeniably broken. The President went so far as to say the White House is “like 30 years behind” in technology.

This is a step in the right direction in my opinion, more and more people are starting to use their phones and other connected devices to get their news, watch videos and send messages. The easier the Government makes it for people to connect to them through this portal the more participation they can expect from the public.  The White House app joins the other list of official government apps such as NASA and the FBI that attempt to achieve this goal of more public interaction.

U.S Government Announces New Terror Alert System

NTAS

The U.S Department of Homeland Security announced that they’ll be changing the terror alert system to a more social-centric approach. Finally getting rid of that silly multi-colored nonsense system that’s been in place for a while now.

The new levels of warning are simple enough, elevated for credible terrorist threats and imminent for a threat that’s coming soon. They plan to use social networks such as Facebook and Twitter to release the warnings, as well as the normal media outlets currently in use.

According to Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano."This is to avoid the problem of cascading alerts where they simply keep adding one to the other to the other to the other and people don't really know what the current one is,"

So it seems like the goal is to make the system simple enough for everyone to understand and provide better information on what to do when the alerts go off.

I think this is a good idea the current system is way too convoluted, warnings can start at one level and bounce up and down depending on newly found information. On top of that there is no clear cut course of action for one to take once they’ve discovered the hard to find current level of warning. The new system seems to simplify the whole process and hopefully will cause less media overreaction from threats that start high only to drop when new Intel is released.

 

Monday, March 7, 2011

Facebook Playing Big Brother, But it’s for Your Own Good

 

Facebook is releasing a new system that allows users to report people they think might be at risk for committing suicide.

The system (which has already been tested and should roll out any day now) is called ‘Good Samaritan, it basically allows users to report people posting things that might lead them to believe their a threat to themselves (suicidal) to Facebook's admins, in return they'll look at the proposed page and decide whether or not they need to alert police.

This is an invasion of privacy on a whole ‘nother level. Facebook, no matter how good their intents, should not be looking into peoples lives and deciding whether or not they are going to take their own lives. I think that if one of my friends was seriously concerned with my committing suicide then they would do a little more than warn Facebook's admins, like I don’t know, calling me and talking to me, maybe having an intervention.

The point is how long will it be before people are turning each other in for crimes, or infringement or any other BS using Facebook as an anonymous snitch? I firmly believe that if anyone has a problem with me, what I post or they way I act they should feel comfortable enough in their own judgment to talk to me directly.

Maybe I’m reading too much into this, and I honestly hope I am. I hope this system never goes beyond allowing people to help others not commit suicide.

That is all, have a nice day

Oh and check the link for a much less biased article over at BBC.

Article: Facebook adds Samaritans Suicide Risk Alert System.

Sunday, March 6, 2011

UK Government is Pushing Forward and Taking Bids For Rural Broadband

RuralUK

The UK government is pushing forward with it’s plans to be their best place for broadband access in Europe.

New bids are being taken to gain and additional £50m, and the government is making it a  locally driven process and is encouraging bids from all local people.

Check the link for the entire article over at BBC news

Article: UK government pushes ahead with rural broadband plans

Stumble